DE / EN

Prof. Dustin Tingley visits the Chair – Talk in the MZES Speaker Series

Prof. Dustin Tingley from Harvard University will be visiting the Chair from October 27–30. He is the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy with a joint appointment in the Harvard Kennedy School of Public Policy and Harvard Government Department. In addition to that, he is Interim Vice Provost for Advances in Learning and previously served as Deputy Vice Provost for Advances in Learning. His research has spanned international relations, international political economy, climate change, causal inference, data science/machine learning, and digital education, with most focus now on the political economy of climate change and energy transitions. For more information on his expertise and fields of study, please take a look at his hompage.

Prof. Tingley will give a talk in the MZES Speaker Series on Tuesday, October 28 at 12:15 in A 5,6, room A231 titled "Who Gets Credit for Green Industrial Policy?"

Abstract:

The United States government passed a climate law in 2022 that included over half a trillion dollars in clean energy production and manufacturing incentives. Policymakers intended for these new green projects to create political constituencies that support the clean energy transition. This paper tests this hypothesis using geolocated survey and investment data. We find that while the public sometimes recognizes visible green projects in their community, this proximity does not affect credit attribution. Americans view their governors as more responsible than the federal government for green investments. To measure credit-claiming, we construct an original database of all company and politician statements about green investments. We find that companies are most likely to give credit to state and local actors, and governors are much likelier to to claim credit than federal politicians. This mixed information environment provides one reason why the public does not attribute more credit to the federal government for green investments. When it is challenging for people to trace economic outcomes back to public policies, reforms are unlikely to affect mass opinion.

Back