Professional and Academic Career
Professional Career
since 2020 Professor for Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Aging, University of Mannheim since 2018 PI of the Emmy Noether Research Group “Source Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults” 2015 – 2020 Assistant Professor (German: “Juniorprofessorin”) for Cognitive Psychology with a research emphasis on cognitive aging, University of Mannheim 2013–2015 Postdoctoral research & teaching assistant, Institute for Experimental Psychology – Mathematical and Cognitive Psychology (Prof. Ute J. Bayen, Ph.D.), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf
2008–2013 Graduate research & teaching assistant, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA Editorial Activities and Editorial Board Memberships
- Associate Editor: “Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications” (since 2022)
- Editorial board membership: “Metacognition and Learning” (since 2020)
- Editor of the topical issue “Strategy Contributions to Cognitive Aging” in Open Psychology (De Gruyter, 2019)
- Editorial board membership: “Journal of Cognition” (since 2019)
- Editorial board membership: “Current Psychology” (Springer) (since 2018)
Ad-hoc Reviews
Ad hoc Reviewer for Journal Articles
- Acta Psychologica
- American Journal of Psychology
- Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
- British Journal of Psychology
- Cognition
- Current Psychology
- Consciousness and Cognition
- European Journal of Aging
- Experimental Psychology
- Gerontology
- GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry
- Journal of Cognition
- Journal of Individual Differences
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition
- Journal of Interindividual Differences
- Memory & Cognition
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Pychology and Aging
- Plos One
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Research Interests and Projects
Research Interests
- Episodic memory, especially source memory
- Cognitive Aging
- Metamemory, especially encoding strategies
- Prospective Memory
- Cognitive modeling
Current Projects
- Context-dependent remembering in older adults (Polish National Science Center, NCN, and German Research Foundation, DFG, Beethoven program), since 2019 as PI (Polish cooperation partners: Drs. Maciej Hanczakowski and Katarzyna Zawadzka, SWPS University in Warsaw)
- Source forgetting in younger and older adults (German Research Foundation, DFG Emmy Noether-Program), since 2018 as PI (international cooperation partners: Prof. Dr. Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, University of Missouri, and Prof. Dr. Karen Mitchell, West Chester University)
- Hierarchical MPT Modeling – Methodological Comparisons and Application Guidelines, Scientific Network Grant (German Research Foundation, DFG), since 2017 as PI with Dr. Julia Groß
- Grant for a Research Training Group (German Research Foundation, DFG), since 2016
PIs (Freiburg, Heidelberg, Koblenz-Landau, Mannheim, Tübingen): Arndt Bröder, Edgar Erdfelder, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Mandy Hütter, Andrea Kiesel, Karl Christoph Klauer, Beatrice G. Kuhlmann, Tanja Lischetzke, Thorsten Meiser, Sabine Sonnentag, Rolf Ulrich, Andreas Voss
GRK 2277: Satistical Modeling in Psychology (SMiP)
SMiP web page
Completed Projects
- Age-related differences in episodic memory: The role of test format adaptivitity and options for support. Research grant from the Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, 2017–2020.
- Source forgetting in younger and older adults: A model-based approach. Starter grant from the Mannheim University Research Fund, 2015–2016.
- Aging-appropriate webpage design: A cognitive psychology approach. Starter grant from the German Society for Online-Research (DGOF e. V.), Interdisciplinary project in cooperation with Prof. Dr. Julia Krönung (business informatics), 2015–2016.
Grants, Awards and Scholarships
Grants
2018–2023 Grant for an Emmy Noether Research Group (German Research Foundation, DFG) Project: Source forgetting in younger and older adults 2017–2020 Research grant from the Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Project: Age-related differences in episodic memory: The role of test format adaptivitity and options for support 2015–2016 Starter grant from the Mannheim University Research Fund Project: Source forgetting in younger and older adults: A model-based approach 2015–2016 Starter grant from the German Society for Online-Research (DGOF e. V.) Project: Aging-appropriate webpage design: A cognitive psychology approach Interdisciplinary project in cooperation with Prof. Dr. Julia Krönung (business informatics) Awards and Scholarships
2017 Fellow of the Psychonomic Society 2015 Member-Select Speaker Award of Psychonomic Society 2012–2013 Dissertation Research Award from the American Psychological Association (APA) 2011–2012 John W. Lindsey Memorial Award, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro 2010–2011 Elizabeth-Duffy-Award, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro 2009–2010 One of three winners of the Student Grant Competition, Association for Psychological Science (APS) Publications
2024
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2024). Enhanced source memory for emotionally valenced sources: Does an affective orienting task make the difference? Cognition & Emotion, 1–22 (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2309707
2023
- Geyer, S., Kuhlmann, B. G., Beller, J. & Grasshoff, J. (2023). The role of school education in time-dependent changes of cognitive abilities in cohorts from midlife to old age. Aging & Mental Health, 27(4), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2068132
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2023). Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(5), 743–765.
- Symeonidou, N., Hassan, A., Porstein, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Is there an emotionality effect in older adults’ source memory? Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 30(5), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2078778
- Tanyas, H. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). The temporal development of memory processes in source monitoring: An investigation with mouse tracking.. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 30(6), 2305–2314. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02289-z
2022
- Beller, J., Kuhlmann, B. G., Sperlich, S. & Geyer, S. (2022). Secular improvements in cognitive aging: contribution of education, health, and routine activities. Journal of Aging and Health, 34(6–8), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211065571
2021
- Grasshoff, J., Beller, J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Geyer, S. (2021). Increasingly capable at the ripe old age? Cognitive abilities from 2004 to 2013 in Germany, Spain, and Sweden. PLOS ONE, 16(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254038
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Brubaker, M. S., Pfeiffer, T. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2021). Longer resistance of associative versus item memory to interference-based forgetting, even in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(3), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000963
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Symeonidou, N., Tanyas, H. & Wulff, L. (2021). Chapter three – Remembering and reconstructing episodic context: an overview of source monitoring methods and behavioral findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 75, 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2021.06.002
- Mieth, L., Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bell, R. (2021). Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion. Memory & Cognition, 49(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01071-z
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). A novel paradigm to assess storage of sources in memory: the source recognition test with reinstatement. Memory, 29(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Better memory for emotional sources? A systematic evaluation of source valence and arousal in source memory.. Cognition & Emotion, 36(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2008323
- Wulff, L., Bell, R., Mieth, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information. Memory, 29(3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1900260
2020
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Frank, D. J. & Danner, D. (2020). Louder = larger = clearer : examining the consistency of metamemory illusions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie = Journal of Psychology, 228(4), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000427
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2020). Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain. Memory & Cognition, 48, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-01008-1
2019
- Ernst, H. M., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Vogel, T. (2019). The origin of illusory correlations: Biased judgments converge with inferences, not with biased memory. Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000444
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Metacognition of prospective memory: Will I remember to remember? In J. Rummel (eds.), Prospective memory (S. 60–77). London [u.a.]: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Topical issue on strategy contributions to cognitive aging. Open Psychology, 1(1), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0020
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Erdfelder, E. & Moshagen, M. (2019). Testing interactions in multinomial processing tree models. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Article 2364). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02364
- Rummel, J., Danner, D. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). The short version of the Metacognitive Prospective Memory Inventory (MPMI-s): factor structure, reliability, validity, and reference data. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences : MISS, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-019-0008-6
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metacognitive expectancy effects in source monitoring: Beliefs, in-the-moment experiences, or both? Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 107, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.009
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 470–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000602
2018
- Kaiser, A., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bosnjak, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of inhibitory-control deficits in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia. Neuropsychology, 32(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000460
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Undorf, M. (2018). Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination. Psychology and Aging, 33(8), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000318
2017
- Frank, D. J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2017). More than just beliefs: experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000332
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Kornadt, A. E., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K. & Wulff, L. (2017). Multidimensionality of younger and older adults’ age stereotypes : the interaction of life domain and adjective dimension. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological and Social Sciences, 72(3), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv049
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2017). Relate it! Objective and subjective evaluation of mediator-based strategies for improving source memory in younger and older adults. Cortex, 91, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.015
2016
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2016). Metacognitive aspects of source monitoring. In J. Dunlosky (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (S. 149–168). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.8
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K. & Kornadt, A. E. (2016). The impact of age stereotypes on source monitoring in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000140
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Boywitt, C. D. (2016). Aging, source memory, and the experience of “remembering”. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 23(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2015.1120270
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2016). Aging and memory improvement through semantic clustering: The role of list-presentation format. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000117
- Rummel, J., Marevic, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Investigating storage and retrieval processes of directed forgetting: a model-based approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1526–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000266
2014
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Rummel, J. (2014). Context-specific prospective-memory processing: Evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding. Memory & Cognition, 42(6), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0405-2
2013
- Arnold, N. R., Bayen, U. J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Vaterrodt, B. (2013). Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: A test of the probability-matching account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 20(2), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0342-7
- Rummel, J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2013). Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.012
2012
- Boywitt, C. D., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Meiser, T. (2012). The role of source memory in older adults' recollective experience. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024729
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2012). Mediator-based encoding strategies in source monitoring in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027863
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Vaterrodt, B. & Bayen, U. J. (2012). Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028147
2011
- Bayen, U. J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source–item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring : Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 64(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2011). Older adults' use of metacognitive knowledge in source monitoring: spared monitoring but impaired control. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021055
Conference Contributions
Talks
- Streitberger, C. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Storage or retrieval underlying the picture superiority effect – That is the question. 64th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco, CA.
- Streitberger, C., Quevedo Pütter, J., Erdfelder, E. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Are recall and recognition conditionally independent? Testing the retrieval independence assumption in multinomial modeling. ESCOP 2023, 23rd Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Porto, Portugal.
- Streitberger, C., Quevedo Pütter, J., Erdfelder, E. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Validation of free-recall-then-recognition multinomial processing tree model. TeaP 2023, 65. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innen, Conference of Experimental Psychologists, Trier, Germany.
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Enhanced Source Memory for Emotional Sources: What Is the Role of Encoding Instructions? 65st Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TEAP), Trier, Germany.
- Tanyas, H., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Erdfelder, E. (2023). Testing the serial processing model of item and source retrieval: Applying the additive factor method to source monitoring. TeaP 2023, 65. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innenen, Conference of Experimental Psychologists, Trier, Germany.
- Tanyas, H., Liss, J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Information accumulation on the item versus source test of source monitoring: Insights from diffusion modeling. Psychonomics 2023, 64. Annual Meeting of Psychonomic Society, San Francisco, CA.
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Symeonidou, N., Tanyas, H., Schönung, D. N., Pinkinelli, J., Mitchell, K. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2022). Item versus source memory: Dissociations in forgetting patterns. TeaP 2022, 64. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innen, Online.
- Streitberger, C., Kuhlmann, B. G., Arnold, N. R. & Meier, M. E. (2022). Is working memory linked to encoding or retrieval processes in long-term memory? 63rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
- Streitberger, C., Kuhlmann, B. G., Arnold, N. R. & Meier, M. E. (2022). Connecting working and long-term memory: A Bayesian-hierarchical multinomial modeling analysis of encoding and retrieval processes. 64. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innen (TeaP), Online.
- Symeonidou, N., Hassan, A., Porstein, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2022). Is there an age-related positivity effect in source memory? Cognitive Aging Conference 2022, Atlanta, GA.
- Tanyas, H., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Erdfelder, E. (2022). Do item and source memory operate in strict sequence? Application of the additive factor method on source monitoring. 8. International Symposium on Brain and Cognitive Science, Online.
- Tanyas, H., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Erdfelder, E. (2022). Does better memory render faster retrieval? Investigating the speed of memory processes in source monitoring. 63rd Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
- Tanyas, H., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Erdfelder, E. (2022). Estimating (guessing-corrected) speed of item and source memory: Extension of two-high-threshold multinomial model of source monitoring. TeaP 2022, 64. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innen, Online.
- Tanyas, H. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Temporal Dynamics of Item and Source Memory: A Mouse-Tracking Study. 62nd Annual Meeting of Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA., New Orleans, LA, Hybrid.
- Tanyas, H., Misirlisoy, M. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Are source monitoring processes affected by methodological differences? : An investigation of source presentation and testing. TeaP 2021, Online.
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Judgments of Guessing partially correct the expectancy illusion on Judgments of Source. 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), London, UK.
- Singmann, H., Heck, D. W., Barth, M., Groß, J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). A Bayesian and Frequentist multiverse pipeline for MPT models—applications to recognition memory. 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), London, UK.
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Source reinstatement facilitates source retrieval. 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), London, UK.
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Is source guessing automatic or controlled? Examining cognitive load and aging. 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), London, UK.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Rummel, J. (2018). Supporting older adults' adaptation to fast-changing context in prospective memory monitoring: Effects of implementation intentions and blocking. 5th International Conference on Prospective Memory (ICPM5), Melbourne, Australia.
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Stereotype reliance in source guessing: Stability across time and stimulus domain. Psychonomics International, International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2017). I still remember where I saw this: No evidence for faster source forgetting in older adults. 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), Dresden, Germany.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2017). Ready … set … test! Exploring older adults’ adaptation to the expected memory-test format. Geneva Aging Series VI, St. Légier, Switzerland.
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2017). Consistency illusion in source monitoring: A-priori beliefs or in-the-moment experience? 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP), Dresden, Germany.
- Wulff, L., Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J. & Meißner, F. (2017). Age stereotype reliance in source guessing: Implicit or explicit? 59. Tagung Experimentell Arbeitender Psychologen, Dresden, Germany.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Expected test format moderates age-related differences in recognition memory. 6th International Conference on Memory, ICOM 6, Budapest, Hungary.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Ready, set, recall! Revisiting the memory benefits of expecting a recall test. International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 2016, Granada, Spain.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Rummel, J. (2016). Imagine *not* doing this! Can implementation intentions be used to prevent older adults' commission errors for completed intentions? Prospective Memory Workshop 2016, St. Légier, Switzerland.
- Marevic, I., Rummel, J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). A multinomial modeling approach to separating storage and retrieval processes in list-method and item-method directed forgetting. 6th International Conference on Memory, ICOM 6, Budapest, Hungary.
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J. & Halbach, A.-L. (2016). Item-memory and source-memory predictions in schema-based source monitoring. 6th International Conference on Memory, ICOM 6, Budapest, Hungary.
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Source guessing as a cognitive trait: Parameter stability across time. Seventh Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop on “Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science”, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Kornadt, A. E., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K. & Wulff, L. (2015). Hat das der Jüngere oder der Ältere gesagt? Einfluss von Altersstereotypen auf die Gedächtnisleistung. 22. Tagung der Fachgruppe Entwicklungspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Frankfurt, Germany.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2014). Aging and memory improvement through semantic clustering: The role of list-presentation format. Cognitive Aging Conference 2014, Atlanta, GA.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2014). Making memory better: Supporting semantic clustering in (older) adults with low working memory capacity. 3rd Geneva Aging Series, Geneva, Switzerland.
Posters
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Emotional valence and arousal of sources does not improve source memory. In A. Huckauf, M. Baumann, M. Ernst, C. Herbert, M. Kiefer & M. Sauter (eds.), TeaP@Home 2021 : Abstracts of the 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists, March 14 – 16, 2021, Ulm, Germany (S. 243–244). , Universität Ulm, Institut für Psycholigie und Pädagogik: Ulm.
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Memory for emotional events: Do valence and arousal affect memory for contextual details? In G. W. Alpers (eds.), Grundlagen- und Psychotherapieforschung Hand in Hand : 38. Symposium Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Mannheim, 12.05.-15.05.2021, Programm (S. 383). , Universität Mannheim Service & Marketing GmbH: Mannheim.
- Noeltner, M., Krönung, J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2020). Disarming prejudice: how ease of use mitigates the detrimental effect of IT-based stereotype threat on the IT task performance of older adults. In 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019) : Munich, Germany, 15–18 December 2019 (S. 1–18). , Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY.
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2020). Emotional content = better memory!? Source memory deficit for negative high-arousing sources. In C. Dobel, C. Giesen, L. A. Grigutsch, J. M. Kaufmann, G. Kovács, F. Meißner, K. Rothermund & S. R. Schweinberger (eds.), TeaP 2020 : abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Jena, Germany March 22–25, 2020 (S. 302). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2020). Rethinking source memory and guessing: General mechanisms and determinants. In C. Lange-Küttner (eds.), TeaP 2019 : abstracts of the 61st Conference of Experimental Psychologists : 61. TeaP 2019 (Tagung Experimentell Arbeitender PsychologInnen) April, 15th to 17th, London, England, United Kingdom (S. ). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Helping yourself and others remember: Age differences in self-generated memory cues. In 5th International Conference Aging & Cognition 2019 : April 24–26 : abstract book (S. 38). , University of Zurich: Zürich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Age-related differences in metacognitive monitoring and control when preparing for recall. In A. C. Schütz (eds.), 60. TeaP 2018 : abstracts of the 60th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : March, 11th to 14th Marburg, Germany (S. 145). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Can older adults flexibly adapt encoding to the expected memory-test format? Evidence from expecting free versus cued recall. In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society : 59th Annual Meeting, November 2018 (S. 218). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Madison, WI.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Ready ... set ... test! Examining older adults' adaptation to the expected memory-test format. In 2018 Cognitive Aging Conference : 2018 CAC Plenary Program (S. 34). , Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta, GA.
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Brubaker, M. S., Pfeiffer, T., Bröder, A. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2018). Aging and interference in item vs. associative memory: Better interference-resistance of associative memory, even in older adults. In 2018 Cognitive Aging Conference : 2018 CAC Poster Abstracts (S. 312). , Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta, GA.
- Rummel, J., Hicks, J. L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Prospective-memory associated attentional decoupling is context dependent. In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society : 59th Annual Meeting, November 2018 (S. 223). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Madison, WI.
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2018). Stereotype reliance in source guessing: State versus cognitive trait? In A. C. Schütz (eds.), 60. TeaP 2018 : abstracts of the 60th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : March, 11th to 14th Marburg, Germany (S. 299). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Bröder, A. & Pfeiffer, T. (2017). Differential short-term interference in item versus source memory: Resistance of source memory, even in older adults. In 58th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society : Vancover, British Columbia, Canada, 9–12 September 2017 : Abstracts (S. 6). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Madison, WI.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Beware of free recall! Age-related deficit in adapting study behavior to the memory-test format. In J. Funke (eds.), TeaP 2016 : abstracts of the 58th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Heidelberg, Germany, March, 21–23, 2016 (S. 179). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Differential forgetting in item versus source memory over a 1-hour delay: Perfect maintenance of source memory, even in older adults. In 57th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society : November 2016 : book of abstracts (S. 144). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Austin, TX.
- Panitz, J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Besken, M. (2016). The influence of deception on memory and metamemory: A multinomial processing tree analysis. In J. Funke (eds.), TeaP 2016 : abstracts of the 58th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Heidelberg, Germany, March, 21–23, 2016 (S. 246). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Rummel, J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and prospective memory: Understanding the cue-focality effect. In J. Funke (eds.), TeaP 2016 : abstracts of the 58th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Heidelberg, Germany, March, 21–23, 2016 (S. 281). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J. & Halbach, A.-L. (2016). Is schema-consistent source guessing compensatory? In J. Funke (eds.), TeaP 2016 : abstracts of the 58th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Heidelberg, Germany, March, 21–23, 2016 (S. 287–288). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2015). If it’s loud I’ll remember all about it! Metacognitive illusions about volume in source monitoring. In 56th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society : November 19 – 22 Chicago, Illinois, USA : Abstracts (S. 6). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Madison, WI.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2015). Loud = Better! Metacognitive illusions about volume transfer to source memory and bias source attributions. In C. Bermeitinger (eds.), TeaP 2015 : Abstracts of the 57th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Hildesheim, Germany, March, 8–11, 2015 (S. 149). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Rummel, J., Marevic, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2015). Different methods, different processes? A multinomial modeling approach to the investigation of directed forgetting processes. In 56th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society : November 19 – 22 Chicago, Illinois, USA : Abstracts (S. 166). Abstracts / Psychonomic Society : ... Annual Meeting, Psychonomic Society: Madison, WI.
- Undorf, M. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2015). How and what am I doing? New findings on metacognitive monitoring and control. In C. Bermeitinger (eds.), TeaP 2015 : Abstracts of the 57th Conference of Experimental Psychologists : Hildesheim, Germany, March, 8–11, 2015 (S. 20). , Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
Professional and Academic Career
Professional Career
seit 2015 Assistant Professor, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau 2019 – 2022 Replacement Professorship, Chair of Cognition and Individual Differences, University of Mannheim 2008 – 2015 Research and teaching assistant, Chair for Cognition and Individual Differences, University of Mannheim 2006 – 2007 Research associate in a project on evidence-based stress prevention and health status (Forschungsschwerpunkt Baden-Württemberg): Cognitive processes and performances (Principal investigator: Prof. Dr. Edgar Erdfelder) Research Interests
Publications
Publikationen
- Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E., Groß, R. M. & Janczyk, M. (2023). Survival processing occupies the central bottleneck of cognitive processing: A psychological refractory period analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R (forthcoming).
- Kroneisen, M. & Bell, R. (2022). Memory as a cognitive requirement for reciprocal cooperation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.008
- Kroneisen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2022). Survival processing effect. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgement, and memory (3. ed., S. 371–385). London ; New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
- Kroneisen, M., Kriechbaumer, M., Kamp, S.-M. & Erdfelder, E. (2022). Realistic context doesn`t amplify the survival processing effect: Lessons learned from Covid-19 scenarios. Acta Psychologica, 222(Article 103459), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103459
- Kroneisen, M., Bott, F. M. & Mayer, M. (2021). Remembering the bad ones : Does the source memory advantage for cheaters influence our later actions positively? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 74(10), 1669–1685. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211007822
- Kroneisen, M., Kriechbauer, M., Kamp, S.-M. & Erdfelder, E. (2021). How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 28(1), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01802-y
- Kroneisen, M. & Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. (2021). Using day and night – scheduling retrieval practice and sleep. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725720965363
- Kroneisen, M. & Steghaus, S. (2021). The influence of decision time on sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Time, moral judgments, and the CNI model. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2202
- Twomey, C. & Kroneisen, M. (2021). The effectiveness of the loci method as a mnemonic device: meta-analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 74(8), 1317–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021821993457
- Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). Adaptive memory: Independent effects of survival processing and reward motivation on memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(Article 588100), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.588100
- Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses. In C. Lange-Küttner (eds.), TeaP 2019 : abstracts of the 61st Conference of Experimental Psychologists : 61. TeaP 2019 (Tagung Experimentell Arbeitender PsychologInnen) April, 15th to 17th, London, England, United Kingdom (S. ). Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich.
- Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). Survival processing modulates the neurocognitive mechanisms of episodic encoding. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience : CABN, 20(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00798-1
- Kroneisen, M. & Heck, D. W. (2020). Interindividual differences in the sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Relating basic personality traits to the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin : PSPB, 46(7), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893994
- Nadarevic, L. & Kroneisen, M. (2020). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer? No evidence for perceptual fluency effects on moral wrongness ratings. Cognition, 196(Article 104156). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104156
- Niedtfeld, I. & Kroneisen, M. (2020). Impaired memory for cooperative interaction partners in borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 7(Article 22), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-020-00137-3
- Wöstenfeld, F. O., Ahmad, S., Kroneisen, M. & Rummel, J. (2020). Does the survival processing memory advantage translate to serial recall? Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), Article 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.243
- Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2019). On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 166, Article 107083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107083