2024
- Berres, S., Erdfelder, E. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2024). Does sleep benefit source memory? Investigating 12-hr retention intervals with a multinomial modeling approach. Memory & Cognition, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01579-8
- Streitberger, C., Kuhlmann, B. G., Meier, M. E. & Arnold, N. R. (2024). Connecting working and long-term memory: Bayesian-hierarchical multinomial model-based analyses reveal storage next to retrieval differences. Memory & Cognition, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01627-3
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2024). Enhanced source memory for emotionally valenced sources: Does an affective orienting task make the difference? Cognition & Emotion, 1–22 (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2309707
2023
- Geyer, S., Kuhlmann, B. G., Beller, J. & Grasshoff, J. (2023). The role of school education in time-dependent changes of cognitive abilities in cohorts from midlife to old age. Aging & Mental Health, 27(4), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2068132
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2023). Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(5), 743–765.
- Symeonidou, N., Hassan, A., Porstein, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). Is there an emotionality effect in older adults’ source memory? Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 30(5), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2078778
- Tanyas, H. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2023). The temporal development of memory processes in source monitoring: An investigation with mouse tracking.. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 30(6), 2305–2314. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02289-z
2022
- Beller, J., Kuhlmann, B. G., Sperlich, S. & Geyer, S. (2022). Secular improvements in cognitive aging: contribution of education, health, and routine activities. Journal of Aging and Health, 34(6–8), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211065571
2021
- Grasshoff, J., Beller, J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Geyer, S. (2021). Increasingly capable at the ripe old age? Cognitive abilities from 2004 to 2013 in Germany, Spain, and Sweden. PLOS ONE, 16(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254038
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Brubaker, M. S., Pfeiffer, T. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2021). Longer resistance of associative versus item memory to interference-based forgetting, even in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(3), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000963
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Symeonidou, N., Tanyas, H. & Wulff, L. (2021). Chapter three – Remembering and reconstructing episodic context: an overview of source monitoring methods and behavioral findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 75, 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2021.06.002
- Mieth, L., Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bell, R. (2021). Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion. Memory & Cognition, 49(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01071-z
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). A novel paradigm to assess storage of sources in memory: the source recognition test with reinstatement. Memory, 29(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310
- Symeonidou, N. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Better memory for emotional sources? A systematic evaluation of source valence and arousal in source memory.. Cognition & Emotion, 36(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2008323
- Wulff, L., Bell, R., Mieth, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information. Memory, 29(3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1900260
2020
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Frank, D. J. & Danner, D. (2020). Louder = larger = clearer : examining the consistency of metamemory illusions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie = Journal of Psychology, 228(4), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000427
- Wulff, L. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2020). Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain. Memory & Cognition, 48, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-01008-1
- Wulff, L. & Scharf, S. E. (2020). Unpacking stereotype influences on source-monitoring processes: What mouse tracking can tell us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87(Article 103917). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103917
2019
- Ernst, H. M., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Vogel, T. (2019). The origin of illusory correlations: Biased judgments converge with inferences, not with biased memory. Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000444
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Metacognition of prospective memory: Will I remember to remember? In J. Rummel (eds.), Prospective memory (S. 60–77). London [u.a.]: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). Topical issue on strategy contributions to cognitive aging. Open Psychology, 1(1), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0020
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Erdfelder, E. & Moshagen, M. (2019). Testing interactions in multinomial processing tree models. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Article 2364). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02364
- Misirlisoy, M., Tanyas, H. & Atalay, N. B. (2019). Does survival context enhance memory for source? A within-subjects comparison. Memory, 27(6), 780–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1566928
- Rummel, J., Danner, D. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2019). The short version of the Metacognitive Prospective Memory Inventory (MPMI-s): factor structure, reliability, validity, and reference data. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences : MISS, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-019-0008-6
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metacognitive expectancy effects in source monitoring: Beliefs, in-the-moment experiences, or both? Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 107, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.009
- Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 470–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000602
2018
- Kaiser, A., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bosnjak, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of inhibitory-control deficits in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia. Neuropsychology, 32(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000460
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Undorf, M. (2018). Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination. Psychology and Aging, 33(8), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000318
- Tanyas, H. & Misirlisoy, M. (2018). Kaynak belleği: Derleme çalışması. Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi = The Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, 58(2), 1436–1457. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.2.13
2017
- Frank, D. J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2017). More than just beliefs: experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000332
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Kornadt, A. E., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K. & Wulff, L. (2017). Multidimensionality of younger and older adults’ age stereotypes : the interaction of life domain and adjective dimension. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological and Social Sciences, 72(3), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv049
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2017). Relate it! Objective and subjective evaluation of mediator-based strategies for improving source memory in younger and older adults. Cortex, 91, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.015
2016
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2016). Metacognitive aspects of source monitoring. In J. Dunlosky (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (S. 149–168). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.8
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K. & Kornadt, A. E. (2016). The impact of age stereotypes on source monitoring in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000140
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Boywitt, C. D. (2016). Aging, source memory, and the experience of “remembering”. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 23(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2015.1120270
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2016). Aging and memory improvement through semantic clustering: The role of list-presentation format. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000117
- Rummel, J., Marevic, I. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2016). Investigating storage and retrieval processes of directed forgetting: a model-based approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1526–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000266
2014
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Rummel, J. (2014). Context-specific prospective-memory processing: Evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding. Memory & Cognition, 42(6), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0405-2
2013
- Arnold, N. R., Bayen, U. J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Vaterrodt, B. (2013). Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: A test of the probability-matching account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 20(2), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0342-7
- Rummel, J., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2013). Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.012
2012
- Boywitt, C. D., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Meiser, T. (2012). The role of source memory in older adults' recollective experience. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024729
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2012). Mediator-based encoding strategies in source monitoring in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027863
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Vaterrodt, B. & Bayen, U. J. (2012). Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028147
2011
- Bayen, U. J. & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source–item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring : Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 64(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001
- Kuhlmann, B. G. & Touron, D. R. (2011). Older adults' use of metacognitive knowledge in source monitoring: spared monitoring but impaired control. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021055