Ausgewählte Publikationen – Arndt Bröder

2023

• Bröder, A., Dülz, E., Heidecke, D., Wehler, A. & Weimann, F. (2023). Improving carbon footprint estimates of food items with a simple seeding procedure. Applied Cognitive Psychology : ACP, 37(3), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4060
• Izydorczyk, D. & Bröder, A. (2023). Measuring the mixture of rule-based and exemplar-based processes in judgment: A hierarchical Bayesian approach. Decision, 10(4), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000195
• Izydorczyk, D. & Bröder, A. (2023). What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? modeling numerical judgments of realistic stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–15 (i. E.). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02331-0
• Schreiner, M. R., Bröder, A. & Meiser, T. (2023). Agency effects on the binding of event elements in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231203951
• Schreiner, M. R., Meiser, T. & Bröder, A. (2023). The binding structure of event elements in episodic memory and the role of animacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 76(4), 705–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221096148

2022

• Undorf, M., Navarro-Báez, S. & Bröder, A. (2022). „You don't know what this means to me“ – Uncovering idiosyncratic influences on metamemory judgments. Cognition, 222(Article 105011), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.105011

2021

• Bröder, A., Platzer, C. & Heck, D. W. (2021). Salience effects in memory-based decisions: An improved replication. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1869752
• Bröder, A., Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., Glöckner, A. & Franke, N. (2021). Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence. Memory & Cognition, 49(November 2021), 1537–1554. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9
• Izydorczyk, D. & Bröder, A. (2021). Exemplar-based judgment or direct recall: On a problematic procedure for estimating parameters in exemplar models of quantitative judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 28(5), 1495–1513. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01861-1
• Undorf, M. & Bröder, A. (2021). Metamemory for pictures of naturalistic scenes: Assessment of accuracy and cue utilization. Memory & Cognition, 49(7), 1405–1422. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01170-5

2020

• Heck, D. W., Seiling, L. & Bröder, A. (2020). The love of large numbers revisited: A coherence model of the popularity bias. Cognition, 195, Article 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104069
• Tuschen-Caffier, B., Engel, J., Koch, S., Kollei, T., Bröder, A., Greve, W., Koch, I., Krahé, B., Kunde, W., Möller, J., Rief, W., Schmitt, M., Strauß, B., van Dick, R. & Wolf, O. T. (2020). Bericht des Fach­kollegiums Psychologie in der Deutschen Forschungs­gemeinschaft (DFG). Psychologische Rundschau, 71(3), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000495
• Undorf, M. & Bröder, A. (2020). Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 73(4), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819882308

2019

• Arnold, N. R., Heck, D. W., Bröder, A., Meiser, T. & Boywitt, C. D. (2019). Testing hypotheses about binding in context memory with a hierarchical multinomial modeling approach : A preregistered study. Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000442
• Bröder, A. & Undorf, M. (2019). Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens. Acta Psychologica, 197, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.011
• Bröder, A. & Undorf, M. (2019). Using the lens model to analyze metacognitive judgments of learning. The Brunswik Society Newsletter, 34, 4–6.
• Jung, D., Erdfelder, E., Bröder, A. & Dorner, V. (2019). Differentiating motivational and cognitive explanations for decision inertia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.01.004
• Malejka, S. & Bröder, A. (2019). Exploring the shape of signal-detection distributions in individual recognition ROC data. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 104, 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.09.001
• Scharf, S. E., Wiegelmann, M. & Bröder, A. (2019). Information search in everyday decisions: The generalizability of the attraction search effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(4), 488–512.
• Shevchenko, Y. & Bröder, A. (2019). Noncompliance with online mood manipulations using film clips: How to detect and control for it. Heliyon, 5(4), e01438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01438
• Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., Rotello, C. M., Annis, J., Aschenbrenner, A., Bröder, A., Cox, G., Criss, A. H., Curl, R. A., Dobbins, I. G., Dunn, J., Enam, T., Evans, N. J., Farrell, S., Fraundorf, S. H., Gronlund, S. D., Heathcote, A., Heck, D. W., Hicks, J. L., Huff, M. J., Kellen, D., Key, K. N., Kilic, A., Klauer, K. C., Kraemer, K. R., Leite, F. P., Lloyd, M. E., Malejka, S., Mason, A., McAdoo, R. M., McDonough, I. M., Michael, R. B., Mickes, L., Mizrak, E., Morgan, D. P., Mueller, S. T., Osth, A., Reynolds, A., Seale-Carlisle, T. M., Singmann, H., Sloane, J. F., Smith, A. M., Tillman, G., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Weidemann, C. T., Wells, G. L., White, C. N. & Wilson, J. (2019). Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919869583

2018

• Bröder, A. & Gräf, M. (2018). Retrieval from memory and cue complexity both trigger exemplar-based processes in judgment. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2018.1444613
• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A. & Bröder, A. (2018). A new and unique prediction for cue-search in a parallel-constraint satisfaction network model: The attraction search effect. Psychological Review, 125(5), 744–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000107
• Marewski, J. N., Bröder, A. & Glöckner, A. (2018). Some metatheoretical reflections on adaptive decision making and the strategy selection problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2075
• Shevchenko, Y. & Bröder, A. (2018). The effect of mood on integration of information in a multi-attribute decision task. Acta Psychologica, 185, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.007
• Undorf, M., Söllner, A. & Bröder, A. (2018). Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6
• Vahsen, N., Bröder, A., Hraska, V. & Schneider, M. (2018). Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with single ventricle after total cavopulmonary connection. Klinische Pädiatrie, 230(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-120526

2017

• Bewernick, B. H., Urbach, A. S., Bröder, A., Kayser, S. & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2017). Walking away from depression-motor activity increases ratings of mood and incentive drive in patients with major depression. Psychiatry Research, 247, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.009
• Bröder, A. & Malejka, S. (2017). On a problematic procedure to manipulate response biases in recognition experiments: the case of „implied“ base rates. Memory, 25(6), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1214735

2016

• Malejka, S. & Bröder, A. (2016). No source memory for unrecognized items when implicit feedback is avoided. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0549-8
• Nett, N., Bröder, A. & Frings, C. (2016). Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs. Acta Psychologica, 171, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.006
• Söllner, A. & Bröder, A. (2016). Toolbox or adjustable spanner? A critical comparison of two metaphors for adaptive decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000162

2015

• Arnold, N. R., Bröder, A. & Bayen, U. J. (2015). Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods. Psychological Research, 79(5), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0608-y
• Ettlin, F. & Bröder, A. (2015). Perceptual grouping does not affect multi-attribute decision making if no processing costs are involved. Acta Psychologica, 157, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.002
• Ettlin, F., Bröder, A. & Henninger, M. (2015). A new task format for investigating information search and organization in multiattribute decisions. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 47(2), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0482-y
• Nett, N., Bröder, A. & Frings, C. (2015). When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1831–1848. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000109

2014

• Glöckner, A. & Bröder, A. (2014). Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 35–50.
• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Bröder, A. & Maydych, V. (2014). Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(2), 129–147.
• Platzer, C., Bröder, A. & Heck, D. W. (2014). Deciding with the eye: How the visually manipulated accessibility of infromation in memory influences decision behavior. Memory & Cognition, 42(4), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0380-z
• Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A. & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007