2021

• Erdfelder, E., Antoni, C. H., Bermeitinger, C., Bühner, M., Elsner, B., Fydrich, T., Gärtner, A., Gollwitzer, M., König, C., Spinath, B., Tuschen-Caffier, B. & Vaterrodt, B. (2021). Präsenzveranstaltungen: Unverzichtbarer Kernbestandteil einer qualitativ hochwertigen universitären Psychologieausbildung : Kommission Studium und Lehre der DGPs. Psychologische Rundschau, 72(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000492
• Kroneisen, M., Kriechbauer, M., Kamp, S.-M. & Erdfelder, E. (2021). How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 28(1), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01802-y
• Twomey, C. & Kroneisen, M. (2021). The effectiveness of the loci method as a mnemonic device: meta-analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021821993457
• Undorf, M., Livneh, I. & Ackerman, R. (2021). Metacognitive control processes in question answering: Help seeking and withholding answers. Metacognition and Learning (forthcoming).

2020

• E. Erdfelder, X. Hu, J. N. Rouder & E.-J. Wagenmakers (eds.) (2020). Cognitive psychometrics: Recent contributions in honor of William H. Batchelder (1940-2018). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 99, .
• Brandt, M., Aßfalg, A., Zaiser, A.-K. & Bernstein, D. M. (2020). A computational approach to the revelation effect. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 112, Article 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104091
• Calio, F., Nadarevic, L. & Musch, J. (2020). How explicit warnings reduce the truth effect: A multinomial modeling approach. Acta Psychologica, 211(Article 103185). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103185
• Erdfelder, E., Hu, X., Rouder, J. N. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Cognitive psychometrics: The scientific legacy of William H. Batchelder (1940-2018). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 99(Article 102468), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102468
• Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). Adaptive memory: Independent effects of survival processing and reward motivation on memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(Article 588100), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.588100
• Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). Survival processing modulates the neurocognitive mechanisms of episodic encoding. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience : CABN, 20(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00798-1
• Groß, J. & Pachur, T. (2020). Parameter estimation approaches for multinomial processing tree models: A comparison for models of memory and judgment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, Article 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102402
• Halamish, V. & Undorf, M. (2020). Do learners spontaneously monitor their memory? The gap between educational-developmental and cognitive-experimental research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(4), 304–305. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000429
• Heck, D. W. & Erdfelder, E. (2020). Benefits of response time-extended multinomial processing tree models: A reply to Starns (2018). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 27(3), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01663-0
• Heck, D. W., Seiling, L. & Bröder, A. (2020). The love of large numbers revisited: A coherence model of the popularity bias. Cognition, 195, Article 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104069
• Heck, D. W., Thielmann, I., Klein, S. A. & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). On the limited generality of air pollution and anxiety as causal determinants of unethical behavior: Commentary on Lu, Lee, Gino, & Galinsky (2018). Psychological Science, 31(6), 741–747.
• Koriat, A., Undorf, M., Newman, E. & Schwarz, N. (2020). Subjective confidence in the response to personality questions: Some insight into the construction of people’s responses to test items. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(Article 1250), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01250
• Koriat, A., Undorf, M. & Schwarz, N. (2020). The effects of group conformity on the prototypical majority effect for confidence and response latency. Social Cognition, 38(5), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.5.447
• Kroneisen, M. & Heck, D. W. (2020). Interindividual differences in the sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Relating basic personality traits to the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin : PSPB, 46(7), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893994
• Kroneisen, M. & Küpper-Tetzel, C. (2020). Using day and night – scheduling retrieval practice and sleep. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725720965363
• Kroneisen, M. & Steghaus, S. (2020). The influence of decision time on sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Time, moral judgments, and the CNI model. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2202
• Nadarevic, L. & Kroneisen, M. (2020). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer? No evidence for perceptual fluency effects on moral wrongness ratings. Cognition, 196(Article 104156). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104156
• Nadarevic, L., Reber, R., Helmecke, A. J. & Köse, D. (2020). Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications : CR:PI, 5(1), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4
• Niedtfeld, I. & Kroneisen, M. (2020). Impaired memory for cooperative interaction partners in borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 7(Article 22), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-020-00137-3
• Pensel, M. C., Schnuerch, M., Elger, C. E. & Surges, R. (2020). Predictors of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures during long-term video-EEG monitoring. Epilepsia : Journal of the International League Against Epilepsy, 61(3), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16454
• Reiber, F., Schnuerch, M. & Ulrich, R. (2020). Improving the efficiency of surveys with randomized response models: A sequential approach based on curtailed sampling. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000353
• Schnuerch, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2020). Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test. Psychological Methods, 25(2), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000234
• Schnuerch, M., Erdfelder, E. & Heck, D. W. (2020). Sequential hypotheses tests for multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 95, Article 102326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102326
• Schnuerch, M., Nadarevic, L. & Rouder, J. N. (2020). The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differencesin the truth effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01814-8
• Tatz, J., Undorf, M. & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (2020). Effect of impoverished information on multisensory integration in judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000953
• Undorf, M. (2020). Fluency illusions in metamemory. In A. M. Cleary (eds.), Memory quirks : the study of odd phenomena in memory (S. 150–174). New York, NY ; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
• Undorf, M., Amaefule, C. O. & Kamp, S.-M. (2020). The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 169(Article 107176). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107176
• Undorf, M. & Bröder, A. (2020). Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 73(4), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819882308
• Undorf, M. & Halamish, V. (2020). New methods and questions in metamemory research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(4), 231–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000420
• Undorf, M., Mah, E. Y., McDonald, D.-L. L., Hamzagic, Z. I., Burnell, R., Garry, M. & Bernstein, D. M. (2020). People who cheat on tests accurately predict their performance on future tests. Learning and Instruction, 66(Article 101295). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101295
• Wöstenfeld, F. O., Ahmad, S., Kroneisen, M. & Rummel, J. (2020). Does the survival processing memory advantage translate to serial recall? Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), Article 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.243

2019

• Arnold, N. R., Heck, D. W., Bröder, A., Meiser, T. & Boywitt, C. D. (2019). Testing hypotheses about binding in context memory with a hierarchical multinomial modeling approach : A preregistered study. Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000442
• Erdfelder, E. & Heck, D. W. (2019). Detecting evidential value and p-hacking with the p-curve tool: A word of caution. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000383
• Forester, G., Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Kamp, S.-M. (2019). On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 166, Article 107083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107083
• Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Heck, D. W. & Matzke, D. (2019). A simple method for comparing complex models: Bayesian model comparison for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models using Warp-III bridge sampling. Psychometrika, 84(1), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9648-3
• Groß, J. & Pachur, T. (2019). Age differences in hindsight bias: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 34(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000329
• Heck, D. W. (2019). A caveat on the Savage-Dickey density ratio: The case of computing Bayes factors for regression parameters. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(2), 316–333. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/bmsp.12150
• Heck, D. W. (2019). Accounting for estimation uncertainty and shrinkage in Bayesian within-subject intervals: A comment on Nathoo, Kilshaw, and Masson (2018). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 88, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.11.002
• Heck, D. W. & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2019). Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 91, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.004
• Heck, D. W. & Erdfelder, E. (2019). Maximizing the expected information gain of cognitive modeling via design optimization. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2(3/4), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00035-0
• Heck, D. W., Overstall, A. M., Gronau, Q. F. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models. Statistics and Computing : SC, 29(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-018-9828-0
• Jung, D., Erdfelder, E., Bröder, A. & Dorner, V. (2019). Differentiating motivational and cognitive explanations for decision inertia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.01.004
• Klein, S. A., Heck, D. W., Reese, G. & Hilbig, B. E. (2019). On the relationship between openness to experience, political orientation, and pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.017
• Kranz, D., Nadarevic, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2019). Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping. Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000457
• Kuhlmann, B. G., Erdfelder, E. & Moshagen, M. (2019). Testing interactions in multinomial processing tree models. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Article 2364). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02364
• Nadarevic, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2019). More evidence against the Spinozan model: Cognitive load diminishes memory for “true” feedback. Memory & Cognition, 47(7), 1386–1400. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00940-6
• Pohl, R. F. (2019). Psychology. In M. Wagner-Egelhaaf (eds.), Handbook of autobiography/autofiction (Bd. 1, S. 136–147). Boston ; Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110279818-016
• Pohl, R. F. & Erdfelder, E. (2019). Hindsight bias in political decision making. In D. P. Redlawsk, The Oxford encyclopedia of political decision making (S. ). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1013
• Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G. & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 470–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000602
• Schild, C., Heck, D. W., Ścigala, K. A. & Zettler, I. (2019). Revisiting REVISE: (Re)Testing unique and combined effects of REminding, VIsibility, and SElf-engagement manipulations on cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part A), Article 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.04.001
• Undorf, M. & Zimdahl, M. F. (2019). Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000571
• Ścigala, K. A., Schild, C., Heck, D. W. & Zettler, I. (2019). Who deals with the devil? Interdependence, personality, and corrupted collaboration. Social Psychological and Personality Science : SPPS, 10(8), 1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618813419

2018

• Bieber, C., Nicolai, J., Gschwendtner, K., Müller, N., Reuter, K., Buchholz, A., Kallinowski, B., Härter, M. & Eich, W. (2018). How does a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) intervention for oncologists affect participation style and preference matching in patients with breast and colon cancer? Journal of Cancer Education, 33(3), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1146-7
• Brandt, M., Schnuerch, M. & Zaiser, A.-K. (2018). Homogeneity of item material boosts the list length effect in recognition memory: A global matching perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000594
• Erdfelder, E. (2018). Fallstricke statistischer Signifikanz : Wissenschaftliche Fachzeitschriften und die Replikationskrise. Forschung & Lehre, 23(2), 114–115.
• Erdfelder, E. (2018). Gibt es ein fotografisches Gedächtnis? Gehirn & Geist, 2018(3), 42–43.
• Erdfelder, E. & Ulrich, R. (2018). Zur Methodologie von Replikationsstudien. Psychologische Rundschau, 69(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000387
• Heck, D. W., Arnold, N. R. & Arnold, D. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 50(1), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0869-7
• Heck, D. W., Erdfelder, E. & Kieslich, P. J. (2018). Generalized processing tree models: Jointly modeling discrete and continuous variables. Psychometrika, 83(4), 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9622-0
• Heck, D. W., Hoffmann, A. & Moshagen, M. (2018). Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 50(5), 1895–1905. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8
• Heck, D. W. & Moshagen, M. (2018). RRreg: An R package for correlation and regression analyses of randomized response data. Journal of Statistical Software, 85(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i02
• Heck, D. W., Thielmann, I., Moshagen, M. & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(4), 356–371.
• Koriat, A., Adiv-Mashinsky, S., Undorf, M. & Schwarz, N. (2018). The prototypical majority effect under social influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin : PSPB, 44(5), 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744527
• Kroneisen, M. (2018). Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 25(3), 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1345-1
• Kroneisen, M. & Bell, R. (2018). Remembering the place with the tiger: Survival processing can enhance source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 25(2), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1431-z
• Kuhlmann, B. G. & Undorf, M. (2018). Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination. Psychology and Aging, 33(8), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000318
• Michalkiewicz, M., Arden, K. & Erdfelder, E. (2018). Do smarter people employ better decision strategies? The influence of intelligence on adaptive use of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2040
• Miller, R., Scherbaum, S., Heck, D. W., Goschke, T. & Enge, S. (2018). On the relation between the (censored) shifted Wald and the Wiener distribution as measurement models for choice response times. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617710465
• Nadarevic, L., Plier, S., Thielmann, I. & Darancó, S. (2018). Foreign language reduces the longevity of the repetition-based truth effect. Acta Psychologica, 191, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.019
• Nicolai, J. & Moshagen, M. (2018). Pathological buying symptoms are associated with distortions in judging elapsed time. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.80
• Nicolai, J., Moshagen, M. & Demmel, R. (2018). A test of expectancy-value theory in predicting alcohol consumption. Addiction Research & Theory, 26(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1334201
• Nicolai, J., Müller, N., Noest, S., Wilke, S., Schultz, J.-H., Gleissner, C. A., Eich, W. & Bieber, C. (2018). To change or not to change – that is the question: A qualitative study of lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction. Chronic Illness, 14(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317694700
• Pohl, R. F., Bayen, U. J., Arnold, N. R., Auer, T.-S. & Martin, C. (2018). Age differences in processes underlying hindsight bias: A life-span study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1476356
• Ulrich, R., Miller, J. & Erdfelder, E. (2018). Effect size estimation from t-statistics in the presence of publication bias: A brief review of existing approaches with some extensions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000319
• Undorf, M., Söllner, A. & Bröder, A. (2018). Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6

2017

• Pohl, R. F. (eds.) (2017). Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgement and memory (2.) . London ; New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Castela, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2017). Further evidence for the memory state heuristic : Recognition latency predictions for binary inferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(6), 537–552.
• Castela, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2017). The memory state heuristic : a formal model based on repeated recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000299
• Erdfelder, E. & Leplow, B. (2017). Ten years after. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000293
• Gronau, Q. F., van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors : the case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760
• Groß, J. & Bayen, U. J. (2017). Effects of dysphoria and induced negative mood on the processes underlying hindsight bias. Cognition & Emotion, 31(8), 1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1249461
• Groß, J., Blank, H. & Bayen, U. J. (2017). Hindsight bias in depression. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(5), 771 –788. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617712262
• Heck, D. W. & Erdfelder, E. (2017). Linking process and measurement models of recognition-based decisions. Psychological Review, 124(4), 442–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000063
• Heck, D. W., Hilbig, B. E. & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions : formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003
• Klein, S. A., Hilbig, B. E. & Heck, D. W. (2017). Which is the greater good? A social dilemma paradigm disentangling environmentalism and cooperation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.001
• Kroneisen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2017). Survival processing effect. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2., S. 357–372). London ; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Motz, G. & Pohl, R. F. (2017). Suggestions and cognitive illusions. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2., S. 467–484). London ; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Nadarevic, L. (2017). Emotionally enhanced memory for negatively arousing words: storage or retrieval advantage? Cognition & Emotion, 31(8), 1557–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1242477
• Nadarevic, L. & Aßfalg, A. (2017). Unveiling the truth: warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect. Psychological Research, 81(4), 814–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0777-y
• Nicolai, J. & Moshagen, M. (2017). Dissociating pathological buying from obsessive-compulsive symptoms using delay discounting. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(3), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000308
• Pohl, R. F. (2017). Introduction. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2., S. 3–21). London ; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Pohl, R. F. (2017). Labelling and overshadowing effects. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2., S. 373–389). London ; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Pohl, R. F. (2017). Measuring age-related differences in using a simple decision strategy : the case of the recognition heuristic. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000283
• Pohl, R. F. & Erdfelder, E. (2017). Hindsight bias. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2., S. 424–445). London ; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Pohl, R. F., Michalkiewicz, M., Erdfelder, E. & Hilbig, B. E. (2017). Use of the recognition heuristic depends on the domain’s recognition validity, not on the recognition validity of selected sets of objects. Memory & Cognition, 45(5), 776–791. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0689-0
• Undorf, M. & Ackerman, R. (2017). The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 24(6), 2003–2011. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1261-4
• Undorf, M. & Zander, T. (2017). Intuition and metacognition : The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 24(4), 1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1189-0
• Undorf, M., Zimdahl, M. F. & Bernstein, D. M. (2017). Perceptual fluency contributes to effects of stimulus size on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 92, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.003

2016

• E. Erdfelder & M. Bosnjak (eds.) (2016). Hotspots in psychology 2016. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 3.
• Coolin, A., Erdfelder, E., Bernstein, D. M., Thornton, A. E. & Thornton, W. L. (2016). Inhibitory control underlies individual differences in older adults' hindsight bias. Psychology and Aging, 31(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000088
• Erdfelder, E. & Bosnjak, M. (2016). Hotspots in psychology : a new format for special issues of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000249
• Heck, D. W. & Erdfelder, E. (2016). Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 23(5), 1440–1465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1025-6
• Heck, D. W. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Adjusted priors for Bayes factors involving reparameterized order constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.004
• Kellen, D., Erdfelder, E., Malmberg, K. J., Dubé, C. & Criss, A. H. (2016). The ignored alternative: an application of Luce’s low-threshold model to recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 75, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.001
• Kroneisen, M., Rummel, J. & Erdfelder, E. (2016). What kind of processing is survival processing? Effects of different types of dual-task load on the survival processing effect. Memory & Cognition, 44(8), 1228–1243. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0634-7
• Michalkiewicz, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2016). Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0567-6
• Moshagen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural equation modeling, 23(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
• Nicolai, J., Buchholz, A., Seefried, N., Reuter, K., Härter, M., Eich, W. & Bieber, C. (2016). When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? : A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret. Patient education and counseling, 99(5), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.019
• Nicolai, J., Darancó, S. & Moshagen, M. (2016). Effects of mood state on impulsivity in pathological buying. Psychiatry Research, 244, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.009
• Pohl, R. F., Erdfelder, E., Michalkiewicz, M., Castela, M. & Hilbig, B. E. (2016). The limited use of the fluency heuristic : converging evidence across different procedures. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0622-y
• Thielmann, I., Heck, D. W. & Hilbig, B. E. (2016). Anonymity and incentives : an investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(5), 527–536.
• Ulrich, R., Erdfelder, E., Deutsch, R., Strauß, B., Brüggemann, A., Hannover, B., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Kirschbaum, C., Blickle, G., Möller, J. & Rief, W. (2016). Inflation von falsch-positiven Befunden in der psychologischen Forschung : mögliche Ursachen und Gegenmaßnahmen. Psychologische Rundschau, 67(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000296
• Undorf, M., Böhm, S. & Cüpper, L. (2016). Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(6), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000207

2015

• Aßfalg, A. & Nadarevic, L. (2015). A word of warning: Instructions and feedback cannot prevent the revelation effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.016
• Coolin, A., Erdfelder, E., Bernstein, D. M., Thornton, A. E. & Thornton, W. L. (2015). Explaining individual differences in cognitive processes underlying hindsight bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 22(2), 328–248. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0691-5
• Dinger, U., Schauenburg, H., Ehrenthal, J. C., Nicolai, J., Mander, J. & Sammet, I. (2015). Inpatient and day-clinic experience scale (IDES) – a psychometric evaluation. Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 61(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2015.61.4.327
• Erdfelder, E., Castela, M., Michalkiewicz, M. & Heck, D. W. (2015). The advantages of model fitting compared to model simulation in research on preference construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Art. 140, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00140
• Groß, J. & Bayen, U. J. (2015). Adult age differences in hindsight bias: The role of recall ability. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000017
• Groß, J. & Bayen, U. J. (2015). Hindsight bias in younger and older adults: The role of access control. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.901289
• Heck, D. W., Wagenmakers, E.-J. & Morey, R. D. (2015). Testing order constraints : Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood. Statistics & Probability Letters, 105, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2015.06.014
• Hilbig, B. E., Michalkiewicz, M., Castela, M., Pohl, R. F. & Erdfelder, E. (2015). Whatever the cost? Information integration in memory-based inferences depends on cognitive effort. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0493-z
• Härter, M., Buchholz, A., Nicolai, J., Reuter, K., Komarahadi, F., Kriston, L., Kallinowski, B., Eich, W. & Bieber, C. (2015). Shared decision making and the use of decision aids : a cluster-randomized study on the efficacy of a training in an oncology setting. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 112(40), 672–679. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0672
• Schnürch, R., Schnuerch, M. & Gibbons, H. (2015). Assessing and correcting for regression toward the mean in deviance-induced social conformity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(May), 669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00669
• Thielmann, I., Erdfelder, E. & Stahlberg, D. (2015). Now you see it, now you don’t : explaining inconsistent evidence on gender stereotyping of newborns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2132
• Undorf, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2015). The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0479-x

2014

• Castela, M., Kellen, D., Erdfelder, E. & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). The impact of subjective recognition experiences on recognition heuristic use: A multinomial processing tree approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 21(5), 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0587-4
• Erdfelder, E. & Kroneisen, M. (2014). Proximate cognitive mechanisms underlying the survival processing effect. In B. L. Schwartz (eds.), What is adaptive about adaptive memory? (S. 172–198). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928057.001.0001
• Heck, D. W., Moshagen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Model selection by minimum description length : Lower-bound sample sizes for the Fisher information approximation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 60, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2014.06.002
• Hilbig, B. E. & Moshagen, M. (2014). Generalized outcome-based strategy classification : Comparing deterministic and probabilistic choice models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 21(6), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0643-0
• Jacobi, F. & Groß, J. (2014). Prevalence of mental disorders, health-related quality of life, and service utilization across the adult life span. Die Psychiatrie, 11(4), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670774
• Kroneisen, M., Rummel, J. & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Working memory load eliminates the survival processing effect. Memory, 22(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.815217
• Küpper-Tetzel, C., Erdfelder, E. & Dickhäuser, O. (2014). The lag effect in secondary school classrooms : Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary. Instructional Science, 42(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2
• Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E. & Moritz, A. (2014). An experimental validation method for questioning techniques that assess sensitive issues. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000226
• Moshagen, M. & Musch, J. (2014). Sample size requirements of the robust weighted least squares estimator. Methodology : European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000068
• Nadarevic, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Initial judgment task and delay of the final validity-rating task moderate the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 23, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.002
• Völkle, M. C. & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Power analysis. In A. C. Michalos, Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (S. 4989–4993). Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer Netherland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2230

2013

• Erdfelder, E. (2013). G*Power. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 599). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Prozessdissoziation. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1234–1235). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Rekognitionsaufgabe. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1319). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Reproduktionsaufgabe. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1326). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Teststärke. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1545). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Verarbeitungsbaummodelle, multinomiale. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1618). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. (2013). Wortanfangsergänzungsaufgabe. In M. A. Wirtz, Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie (S. 1679). Bern: Huber.
• Erdfelder, E. & Moshagen, M. (2013). Conjoint measurement of disorder prevalence, test sensitivity, and test specificity: Notes on Botella, Huang, and Suero’s multinomial model. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(876), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00876
• Greve, W., Bröder, A. & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Result-blind peer reviews and editorial decisions: A missing pillar of scientific culture. European Psychologist, 18(4), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000144
• Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M. & Heydasch, T. (2013). Tracing the path from personality – via cooperativeness – to conservation. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1856
• Kroneisen, M. & Bell, R. (2013). Sex, cheating, and disgust : Enhanced source memory for trait information that violates gender stereotypes. Memory, 21(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.713971
• Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E. & Buchner, A. (2013). The proximate memory mechanism underlying the survival processing effect : Richness of encoding or interactive imagery? Memory, 21(4), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.741603
• Nadarevic, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Spinoza’s error: Memory for truth and falsity. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0251-z
• Pohl, R. F., Erdfelder, E., Hilbig, B. E., Liebke, L. & Stahlberg, D. (2013). Effort reduction after self-control depletion : The role of cognitive resources in use of simple heuristics. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.758101
• Undorf, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Separation of encoding fluency and item difficulty effects on judgements of learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP, 66(10), 2060–2072. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777751

2012

• Aßfalg, A. & Bernstein, D. M. (2012). Puzzles produce strangers : A puzzling result for revelation-effect theories. Journal of Memory and Language : JML, 67(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.011
• Aßfalg, A. & Erdfelder, E. (2012). CAML – Maximum likelihood consensus analysis. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 44(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0138-0
• Bell, R., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Giang, T., Schain, C. & Riether, N. (2012). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026017
• Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M. & Giang, T. (2012). On the flexibility of social source memory : A test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1512–1529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028219
• Boywitt, C. D. & Brandt, M. (2012). The primacy effect in memory for repetitions: Evidence for the role of lag between repetitions in source monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.617303
• Erdfelder, E. (2012). Gedächtnismodelle. In K.-P. Horn, Klinkhardt Lexikon Erziehungswissenschaft KLE (S. 449). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
• Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E. & Pohl, R. F. (2012). A matter of time : Antecedents of one-reason decision making based on recognition. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.006
• Küpper-Tetzel, C. & Erdfelder, E. (2012). Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect : A multinomial processing tree analysis. Memory, 20(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.631550
• Moshagen, M. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural equation modeling, 19(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.634724
• Moshagen, M. & Musch, J. (2012). Surveying multiple sensitive attributes using an extension of the randomized-response technique. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr034
• Moshagen, M., Musch, J. & Erdfelder, E. (2012). A stochastic lie detector. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 44(1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0144-2
• Pohl, R. F. & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). The role of subjective linear orders in probabilistic inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 19(6), 1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0289-8
• Waubert de Puiseau, B., Aßfalg, A., Erdfelder, E. & Bernstein, D. M. (2012). Extracting the truth from conflicting eyewitness reports : A formal modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 18(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029801

2011

• Bernstein, D. M., Erdfelder, E., Meltzoff, A. N., Peria, W. & Loftus, G. R. (2011). Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021971
• Erdfelder, E., Küpper-Tetzel, C. & Mattern, S. D. (2011). Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00147
• Glöckner, A. & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 705–710.
• Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E. & Pohl, R. F. (2011). Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022638
• Kroneisen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2011). On the plasticity of the survival processing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024493
• Marewski, J. N., Pohl, R. F. & Vitouch, O. (2011). Recognition-based judgments and decisions : what we have learned (so far). Judgment and Decision Making, 6(5), 359–380.
• Marewski, J. N., Pohl, R. F. & Vitouch, O. (2011). Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II). Judgment and Decision Making, 6(1), 1–6.
• Moshagen, M. & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification : A falsificationist proposition. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 814–820.
• Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E. & Musch, J. (2011). Defection in the dark? A randomized-response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.793
• Nadarevic, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2011). Cognitive processes in implicit attitude tasks: An experimental validation of the Trip Model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.776
• Ostapczuk, M., Musch, J. & Moshagen, M. (2011). Improving self-report measures of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomized-response-technique. Statistical methods in medical research, 20(5), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210372843
• Pohl, R. F. (2011). On the use of recognition in inferential decision making : An overview of the debate. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(5), 423–438.
• Undorf, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2011). Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: Conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1264–1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023719

2010

• E. Erdfelder, U. J. Bayen, A. G. Greenwald, G. Humphreys, D. Kerzel, I. Koch, H. Leuthold, T. Meiser, J. Musch & K. Rothermund (eds.) (2010). Experimental psychology. , 57, .
• Erdfelder, E. (2010). Experimental psychology: A note on statistical analysis. Experimental Psychology, 57(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000001
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., Buchner, A. & Cüpper, L. (2010). Effektgröße und Teststärke. In H. Holling (eds.), Handbuch Statistik, Methoden und Evaluation (S. 358–369). Göttingen [u.a.]: Hogrefe.
• Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4), 272–284.
• Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Reconsidering “evidence” for fast-and-frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 17(6), 923–930. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.923
• Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E. & Pohl, R. F. (2010). One-reason decision-making unveiled: A measurement model of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017518
• Hilbig, B. E., Scholl, S. G. & Pohl, R. F. (2010). Think or blink – is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy? Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4), 300–309.
• Marewski, J. N., Pohl, R. F. & Vitouch, O. (2010). Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (Vol.1). Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4), 207–215.
• Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinominal processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 42(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
• Moshagen, M., Musch, J., Ostapczuk, M. & Zhao, Z. (2010). Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: An extension of the randomized-response technique. Epidemiology, 21(3), 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61dbc
• Moshagen, M. & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies : IJHCS, 68(10), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
• Nadarevic, L. (2010). Die Wahrheitsillusion . Berlin: Köster.
• Nicolai, J., Demmel, R. & Moshagen, M. (2010). The comprehensive alcohol expectancy questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, scale refinement, and further validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(5), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.497396
• Pohl, R. F. (2010). Das autobiographische Gedächtnis. In C. Gudehus (eds.), Gedächtnis und Erinnerung : ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (S. 75–84). Stuttgart [u.a.]: Metzler.
• Pohl, R. F., Bayen, U. J. & Martin, C. (2010). A multi-process account of hindsight bias in children. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1268–1282. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020209
• Schmid, J., Herholz, S. C., Brandt, M. & Buchner, A. (2010). Recall-to-reject: The effect of category cues on false recognition. Memory, 18(8), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.517756
• Undorf, M. (2010). Metagedächtnis und Lernen . Berlin: Logos Verlag.
• Völkle, M. C. & Erdfelder, E. (2010). Varianz- und Kovarianzanalyse. In C. Wolf (eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse (S. 451–489). Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.
• Zettler, I. & Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Attitudes of the selfless : Explaining political orientation with altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(3), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.002
• Zettler, I. & Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Honesty-humility and a person-situation-interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24(7), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.757

2009

• E. Erdfelder, U. J. Bayen, A. G. Greenwald, G. Humphreys, D. Kerzel, I. Koch, H. Leuthold, T. Meiser, J. Musch & K. Rothermund (eds.) (2009). Experimental psychology. , 56, .
• Bernstein, D. M., Rudd, M. E., Erdfelder, E., Godfrey, R. & Loftus, E. F. (2009). The revelation effect for autobiographical memory: A mixture-model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 16(3), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.463
• Buchner, A., Mayr, S. & Brandt, M. (2009). The advantage of positive text-background polarity is due to high display luminance. Ergonomics, 52(7), 882–886.
• Erdfelder, E. (2009). Experimental Psychology: Continuity and change. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 1–4.
• Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M. & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: a review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 21(3), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 41(4), 1149–1160.
• Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true : negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 983–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
• Hilbig, B. E. & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making : a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1296–1305. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016565
• Hilbig, B. E., Pohl, R. F. & Bröder, A. (2009). Criterion knowledge : A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(5), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.644
• Hilbig, B. E. & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation : Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
• Massen, C., Vaterrodt, B., Krings, L. & Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Effects of instruction on learners’ ability to generate an effective pathway in the method of loci. Memory, 17(7), 724–731.
• Moritz, S. & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Biased processing of threat-related information rather than knowledge deficits contributes to overestimation of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behavior Modification, 33(6), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445509344217
• Moshagen, M., Musch, J. & Göritz, A. S. (2009). A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance.. Ergonomics, 52(10), 1311–1320.
• Ostapczuk, M., Moshagen, M., Zhao, Z. & Musch, J. (2009). Assessing sensitive attributes via the randomized response technique: Evidence for the importance of response symmetry. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(2), 267–287.
• Ostapczuk, M., Musch, J. & Moshagen, M. (2009). A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes towards foreigners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 920–931.
• Vent, S. & Erdfelder, E. (2009). Das Mannheimer Informationssystem für Studieninteressierte der Sozialwissenschaften: Führt ein Erwartungstest als Self-Assessment tatsächlich zu korrekteren Erwartungen bei Studienanfängern? In G. Rudinger (eds.), Self-Assessment an Hochschulen : Von der Studienfachwahl zur Profilbildung (S. 99–110). Göttingen: V&R Unipress.
• Vent, S., Erdfelder, E. & Heilig, B. (2009). MISS – Mannheimer Informationssystem für Studieninteressierte der Sozialwissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Beratung und Studium : ZBS, 4(1), 23–25.

2008

• E. Erdfelder, U. J. Bayen, A. G. Greenwald, G. Humphreys, D. Kerzel, I. Koch, H. Leuthold, T. Meiser, J. Musch & K. Rothermund (eds.) (2008). Experimental Psychology. , 55, .
• Buchner, A. & Brandt, M. (2008). Gedächtniskonzeptionen und Wissensrepräsentationen. In J. Müsseler (eds.), Allgemeine Psychologie (2., S. 429–464). Berlin [u.a.]: Spektrum, Akad. Verl.
• Erdfelder, E. (2008). Experimental Psychology: Good news. Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 1–2.
• Hilbig, B. E. (2008). Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making : neuroticism and the recognition heuristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.001
• Hilbig, B. E. (2008). One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 457–462.
• Hilbig, B. E. & Pohl, R. F. (2008). Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.394
• Pohl, R. F. (2008). Das autobiografische Gedächtnis: Inhalt, Menge, Authentizität und Funktion. In G. D. Rey (eds.), Kognitive Psychologie : Ausgewählte Grundlagen- und Anwendungsbeispiele (S. 167–179). Lengerich [u.a.]: Pabst Science Publ.
• Stahl, C., Klauer, K. C. & Erdfelder, E. (2008). Matching bias in the selection task is not eliminated by explicit negations. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(3), 281–303.

2007

• E. Erdfelder, U. J. Bayen, A. G. Greenwald, G. Humphreys, D. Kerzel, I. Koch, H. Leuthold, T. Meiser, J. Musch & K. Rothermund (eds.) (2007). Experimental Psychology. , 54, .
• Bayen, U. J., Pohl, R. F., Erdfelder, E. & Auer, T.-S. (2007). Hindsight bias across the life span. Social Cognition, 25(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.83
• Blank, H., Musch, J. & Pohl, R. F. (2007). Hindsight bias : on being wise after the event. Social Cognition, 25(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.1
• Brandt, M. (2007). Bridging the gap between measurement models and theories of human memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215(1), 72–85.
• Erdfelder, E. (2007). Experimental Psychology: A successful transition. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 1–5.
• Erdfelder, E. & Brandt, M. (2007). Memory measurement. In J. Wassmann (eds.), Experiencing new worlds (S. 201–223). New York, NY [u.a.]: Berghan Books.
• Erdfelder, E., Brandt, M. & Bröder, A. (2007). Recollection biases in hindsight judgments. Social Cognition, 25(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.114
• Erdfelder, E., Cüpper, L., Auer, T.-S. & Undorf, M. (2007). The four-states model of memory retrieval experiences. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215(1), 61–71.
• Erdfelder, E. & Geisberger, A. (2007). Curriculare Normwerte für die neuen Studiengänge. Psychologische Rundschau, 58(4), 274–277.
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical scienes. Behavior Research Methods : BRM, 39(2), 175–191.
• Hausmann, D., Läge, D., Pohl, R. F. & Bröder, A. (2007). Testing QuickEst : No evidence for the Quick-Estimation heuristic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440600723055
• Holling, H. & Erdfelder, E. (2007). Editorial : The new Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215(1), 1–3.
• Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C. & Erdfelder, E. (2007). The abstract selection task: New data and an almost comprehensive model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 680–703.
• Mayr, S., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Faul, F. (2007). A short tutorial of GPower. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 51–59.
• Pohl, R. F. (2007). Das autobiographische Gedächtnis : die Psychologie unserer Lebensgeschichte . Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
• Pohl, R. F. (2007). Ways to assess hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.14

2006

• Bayen, U. J., Erdfelder, E., Bearden, J. N. & Lozito, J. P. (2006). The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1003–1018.
• Brandt, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2006). Übersicht : Methoden und Statistik. In Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (S. 677–684). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
• Buchner, A., Brandt, M., Bell, R. & Weise, J. (2006). Car backlight position and fog density bias observer-car distance estimates and time-to-collision judgments. Human Factors, 48(2), 300–317.
• Erdfelder, E., Cüpper, L. & Auer, T.-S. (2006). Multinomiale Verarbeitungsbaummodelle. In Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (S. 760–768). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
• Erdfelder, E. & Musch, J. (2006). Experimental methods of psychological assessment. In Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology (S. 205–220). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
• Moritz, S. & Pohl, R. F. (2006). False beliefs maintenance for fear-related information in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology, 200(6), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.737
• Pohl, R. F. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.522

2005

• K. Schweizer & E. Erdfelder (eds.) (2005). Themenheft: Sprache und Denken I. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 3.
• K. Schweizer & E. Erdfelder (eds.) (2005). Themenheft: Sprache und Denken II. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 4.
• Buchner, A. & Erdfelder, E. (2005). Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 33(1), 86–97.
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F. & Buchner, A. (2005). Power analysis for categorical methods. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (S. 1565–1570). London; Weinheim [u.a.]: Wiley.
• Klauer, K. C. & Musch, J. (2005). Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework? No Problem! : Reply to Garnham and Oakhill. Psychological Review, 112, 519–520.
• Klauer, K. C., Musch, J. & Eder, A. B. (2005). Priming of semantic classifications : Late and response-related, or earlier and more central? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : PB&R, 12(5), 897–903.
• Liekweg, A., Eckhardt, M., Malfair Taylor, S. C., Erdfelder, E. & Jaehde, U. (2005). Patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment : Psychometric assessment and application of the Canadian PS-CaTE-questionnaire in German settings. Pharmacy World & Science : PWS, 27(2), 96–103.
• Liekweg, A., Eckhardt, M., Malfair Taylor, S. C., Erdfelder, E. & Jaehde, U. (2005). Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharmacy World & Science : PWS, 27(2), 96–103.
• Pohl, R. F., Bender, M. & Lachmann, G. (2005). Autobiographical memory and social skills of men and women. Applied Cognitive Psychology : ACP, 19(6), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1104
• Pohl, R. F. & Haracic, I. (2005). Der Rückschaufehler bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie, 37(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.37.1.46
• Schweizer, K. & Erdfelder, E. (2005). Sprache und Denken : Neue Argumente und Befunde zu einem alten Thema. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213(3), 127–132.

2004

• Erdfelder, E. & Funke, J. (eds.) (2004). Allgemeine Psychologie und deduktivistische Methodologie . Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Pohl, R. F. (eds.) (2004). Cognitive illusions : a handbook of fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement, and memory . Hove [u.a.] ; London: Psychology Press ; Taylor & Francis.
• Cüpper, L. & Erdfelder, E. (2004). Die Wortstammlänge beeinflusst kontrollierte, nicht aber automatische Gedächtnisprozesse in der Wortstammergänzungsaufgabe. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212(3), 167–176.
• Erdfelder, E. (2004). Angewandte deduktivistische Methodologie in der empirischen Psychologie. In Allgemeine Psychologie und deduktivistische Methodologie (S. 98–123). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Erdfelder, E. (2004). Über Allgemeine und Differentielle Psychologie. In Seelenlandschaften : Streifzüge durch die Psychologie (S. 78–79). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Faul, F. & Brandt, M. (2004). GPOWER: Teststärkeanalysen leicht gemacht. In E. Erdfelder (eds.), Allgemeine Psychologie und deduktivistische Methodologie (S. 148–166). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Gheorghiu, V. A., Molz, G. & Pohl, R. F. (2004). Suggestions and illusions. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement, and memory (S. 399–421). Hove: Psychology Press.
• Golz, D. & Erdfelder, E. (2004). Effekte von L-Dopa auf die Speicherung und den Abruf semantisch verbundener und unverbundener verbaler Informationen bei Schlaganfallpatienten. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 15(4), 275–286.
• Grondin, S. & Musch, J. (2004). Age chronologique et développement de la compétence sportive. Physical and Health Education Journal, 70(2), 16–20.
• Musch, J., Rahn, B. & Lieberei, W. (2004). Bonner Postkorb-Module (BPM). In W. Sarges (eds.), Handbuch wirtschaftspsychologischer Testverfahren (2. Aufl., Bd. 1, S. 191–195). Lengerich [u.a.]: Pabst.
• Pohl, R. F. (2004). Effects of labeling. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (S. 327–344). Hove: Psychology Press.
• Pohl, R. F. (2004). Hindsight bias. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement, and memory (S. 363–378). Hove: Psychology Press.
• Pohl, R. F. (2004). Introduction : Cognitive illusions. In R. F. Pohl (eds.), Cognitive illusions : a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement, and memory (S. 1–20). Hove: Psychology Press.
• Wegener, I., Wawrzyniak, A., Imbierowicz, K., Conrad, R., Musch, J., Geiser, F., Wermter, F. & Liedtke, R. (2004). Affektives Priming bei adipösen Patienten : Die Rolle automatischer Bewertungsprozesse bei Übergewicht. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und medizinische Psychologie : PPmP, 54(2), 116.

2003

• Blank, H., Fischer, V. & Erdfelder, E. (2003). Hindsight bias in political elections. Memory, 11(4/5), 491–504.
• Buchner, A. & Brandt, M. (2003). Further evidence for systematic reliability differences between explicit and implicit memory tests. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology / A, 56(2), 193–209.
• Buchner, A. & Brandt, M. (2003). The principle of multiple memory systems. In The principles of learning and memory (S. 93–111). Basel: Birkhäuser.
• Erdfelder, E. (2003). Das Gedächtnis des Augenzeugen : Aktuelle Hypothesen und Befunde zur Genese fehlerhafter Aussagen. Report Psychologie : rp, 28(7/8), 434–445.
• Erdfelder, E. & Buchner, A. (2003). Prozessdissoziationsprozedur : Quo vadis? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211(1), 17–25.
• Klauer, K. C., Mierke, J. & Musch, J. (2003). The positivity proportion effect : A list-context effect in masked affective priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 953–967.
• Klauer, K. C. & Musch, J. (2003). Affective priming : Findings and theories. In The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion (S. 7–49). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
• Musch, J. (2003). Personality differences in hindsight bias. Memory, 11(4/5), 473–489.
• Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (2003). The Psychology of Evaluation : Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion . Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (2003). The Psychology of Evaluation: An Introduction. In The Psychology of Evaluation : Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion (S. 1–5). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Shohat, M. & Musch, J. (2003). Online auctions as a research tool : A field experiment on ethnic discrimination. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 139–145.