Bild: artFOTO Neckarsulm
Akademischer und beruflicher Werdegang
10/ 2016–02/2017 Vertretungsprofessur für Wirtschaftspsychologie, Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart Seit 03/ 2014 Fellow im Margarete-von-Wrangell-Habilitationsprogramm 12/ 2011 Dr. rer. soc., Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Mannheim Seit 02/ 2008 Business Coach International Seit 09/ 2007 Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin, Lehrstuhl für Mikrosoziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Universität Mannheim 03/ 2005–04/2005 Forschungsaufenthalt bei Prof. Dr. Jamin Halberstadt, University of Otago (Dunedin, Neuseeland) 2002–2007 Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft, Lehrstuhl für Sozialpsychologie, Universität Heidelberg 2002–2007 Studium der Psychologie, Universität Heidelberg Forschungsinteressen und Themenschwerpunkte für Abschlussarbeiten
Advice Giving
Construal Level
Consumer Judgments and Behavior
Decision Making
Fluency
Intertemporal Judgments
Investment Decisions
Judgments of Randomness
Medical Decision Making
Risky Choices
Self-Control and Self-Regulation
Time Management
Publikationen und Konferenzbeiträge
Publikationen
Bruk, A., Scholl, S. G., & Bless, H. (July 2021). You and I Both: Self-Compassion Reduces Self–Other Differences in Evaluation of Showing Vulnerability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/01461672211031080
Bruk, A., Scholl, S. G., & Bless, H. (2018). Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(2), 192–205. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000120.
Raue M., & Scholl S. G. (2018). The Use of Heuristics in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty. In M. Raue, E. Lermer, & B. Streicher (eds). Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis (pp.153–179). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_7.
Friedrich, K., Smit, M., Wannhoff, A., Rupp, C., Scholl, S. G., Antoni, C., Dollinger, M., Neumann-Haefelin, C., Stremmel, W., Weiss, K. H., Schemmer, P., Gotthardt, D. N.. (2016). Coffee consumption protects against progression in liver cirrhosis and increases long-term survival after liver transplantation. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 31, 1470-1475. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13319.
Scholl, S. G., & Bless, H., (2016). Urteilsheuristiken. In D. Frey & H.-W. Bierhoff, (Eds.). Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Selbst und Soziale Kognition – Sozialpsychologie, Band 1 (pp. 387–408). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Friedrich, K., Baumann, C., Brune, M., Wannhoff, A., Rupp, C., Scholl, S. G., Antoni, C, Dollinger, M., Neumann-Haefelin, C., Weiss, K. H., Stremmel, W., Schemmer, P., & Gotthardt, D. N. (2015). Association of serum zinc levels with liver function and survival in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 400, 805–811. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1334-7.
Friedrich, K., Grüter, L., Gotthardt, D. N., Eisenbach, C., Stremmel, W., Scholl, S. G.,Rex, D. K. & Sieg, A. (2015). Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 82, 133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.048
Friedrich, K., Scholl, S. G., Beck, S., Gotthardt, D., Stremmel, W., Rex, D., BNG-Study Group, & Sieg, A. (2014). Respiratory complications in outpatient endoscopy with endoscopist-directed sedation. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, 23, 255–259. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.233.kf1.
Scholl, S. G., Greifeneder, R. & Bless, H. (2014). When fluency signals truth: Prior successful reliance on fluency moderates the impact of fluency on truth judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 268–280. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1805.
Sieg, A., BNG-Study Group, Beck, S., Scholl, S. G., Stremmel, W., Rex, D., & Friedrich, K. (2014). Safety analysis of Endoscopist-Directed Propofol Sedation. A prospective, national multicenter study of 24,441 patients in German outpatient practices. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 29(3), 517–523. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12458.
Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Scholl, S. G. (2013). About swift defaults and sophisticated safety nets: A process perspective on fluency’s validity in judgment. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking (pp. 220–233). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203078938.
Scholl, S. G. (2012). Judgments of randomness in binary sequences: A constructive process. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Scholl, S. G. & Greifeneder, R. (2011). Disentangling the effects of alternation rate and maximum run length on judgments of randomness. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 531–541. PDF.
Hilbig, B. E., Scholl, S. G., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). Think or blink – is the recognition heuristic an ''intuitive'' strategy? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 300–309. PDF.
Plessner, H. & Czenna, S. (2008). The benefits of intuition. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch, T. (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 251 – 265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9780203838099.
Plessner, H. & Czenna, S. (2007). Intuition als Ressource beim Urteilen und Entscheiden. Personalführung, 4, 80–88.